← back to the main dashboard · curation cost per rubric

SWE-bench Verified — harness 2 (9/14): interpreter, CWM-only, dual channel

SWE-bench Verified, all 500 instances held out · Haiku 4.5 agent · official test grading · harness 2 (pulled 2026-09-14): the agent is told which channel it is on, package installs never routed, 120 s grader timeout, reopening circuit breaker, judge latency recorded. CWM library = mined 1000 + task criterion + feedback preamble. Dual arms run each routed command for real under a 30 / 60 / 120 s budget AND grade the change set; the agent reads both.

Superseded. This page reports the 9/07 run-and-hide design: execution commands were still run in the pod and only their output was hidden, so wall clock here includes real training/test execution, the side-channel scans after every execution, and (for some arms) API throttling. The canonical never-execute results are on SWE-bench Verified — harness 2 (9/14): interpreter, CWM-only, dual channel — canonical hybrid CWM.

1Experiment setting

Each instance is a real GitHub issue in a Python repository; the agent must produce a patch that makes the hidden FAIL_TO_PASS tests pass without breaking PASS_TO_PASS. Resolved = the official SWE-bench harness verdict.

A Haiku 4.5 agent works in the repository by issuing bash commands. The settings differ only in what answers those commands:

In every world-model setting an execution command is still run in the pod (its side effects persist) and only the observation the agent sees is replaced by the world model's answer; reads, searches and edits are always real. Same settings as the 9/07 SWE-bench page.

Interpreter baseline — every command runs; the agent sees real output.
agentHaiku 4.5bash commandinterpreterruns everything, 60 s capreal output + return code
No code execution (floor) — reads and edits are real; runs return nothing.
agentHaiku 4.5routerrule: does it run code?reads / edits / grepinterpreterreal output + rcreal outputcode executionnothing backoutput withheld · rc hiddenthe run still happens; files it writes are quarantined
All-CWM (original) — the CWM answers everything, using the same retrieved rubrics; the agent cannot read code.
agentHaiku 4.5every command, reads includedCWMgrades the diff vs the retrieved rubricsrubric verdict onlyrubric library10 / 100 / 1000 mined rubricstop-12 nearest to the taskthe agent never sees file contentsor any command's output
Hybrid CWM (this work) — reads go to the interpreter, runs go to the CWM with retrieved rubrics.
agentHaiku 4.5routerrule: does it run code?reads / edits / grepinterpreterreal output + rcreal outputcode executionCWMgrades the diff vs the retrieved rubricsrubric library1000 mined rubricstop-12 nearest totask + diff + commandverdict + real rcthe run executes for side effects only; its output is never shown

The router is a fixed rule, not a model. The command string is split on every bash separator (\n ; && || | &), heredoc bodies are dropped and wrapper prefixes (sudo, timeout N, VAR=x) skipped; a command is code execution if any segment's first word is an interpreter or test runner (python, pytest, tox, make, manage.py, runtests.py, bash, sh, …), a script or repo executable (./run.sh, /testbed/bin/x), or contains a substitution / xargs / find -exec that runs one. Everything else — cat, ls, grep, sed -i, git, heredoc writes — is a read or edit and goes to the interpreter. A mixed command such as cat > t.py <<EOF … EOF && python t.py counts as execution.

The CWM (Haiku 4.5 or Opus 5) reads the task, the agent's current diff and the command, grades the diff against the 12 rubrics retrieved from the mined library (nearest to the task, the files the diff touches and the command; in the hybrid arms a standing task criterion — “does the change implement what the issue asks?” — is added to the list) and returns the per-rubric verdict. Files written by a run are quarantined so the agent cannot read the output back; every trajectory is audited for leakage. No setting ever sees the hidden grading tests.

2Results

resolved, % of 500

0%20%40%60%80%100%pendingpendingpendingpendingpendingpendingpendingpendingpendingpendinginterpreterrealexecutionno code exec.bashonlyhybrid CWMOpusmined 1000 + preamblehybrid CWMHaikumined 1000 + preambledual 30 sOpusdual 30 sHaikudual 60 sOpusdual 60 sHaikudual 120 sOpusdual 120 sHaiku
armcountratealso
interpreter · real · executionpending
no code exec. · bash · onlypending
hybrid CWM · Opus · mined 1000 + preamblepending
hybrid CWM · Haiku · mined 1000 + preamblepending
dual 30 s · Opuspending
dual 30 s · Haikupending
dual 60 s · Opuspending
dual 60 s · Haikupending
dual 120 s · Opuspending
dual 120 s · Haikupending

Efficiency: median wall-clock per instance

0.0 min2.4 min4.8 min7.2 min9.6 min12.0 min4.8 min5.1 min4.7 min5.4 min6.5 min6.9 min6.3 min6.9 min6.3 min6.7 mininterpreterrealexecutionno code exec.bashonlyhybrid CWMOpusmined 1000 + preamblehybrid CWMHaikumined 1000 + preambledual 30 sOpusdual 30 sHaikudual 60 sOpusdual 60 sHaikudual 120 sOpusdual 120 sHaiku

Wall-clock per instance from the first command to the last (minutes), from the per-command timing records of each pod.

Efficiency: median agent LLM calls per instance

032649612816058656063464947474748interpreterrealexecutionno code exec.bashonlyhybrid CWMOpusmined 1000 + preamblehybrid CWMHaikumined 1000 + preambledual 30 sOpusdual 30 sHaikudual 60 sOpusdual 60 sHaikudual 120 sOpusdual 120 sHaiku

Efficiency: median seconds per LLM call (wall clock / calls, per instance)

0.0 s3.0 s6.0 s9.0 s12.0 s15.0 s5.1 s4.6 s5.0 s5.4 s7.8 s8.6 s8.0 s8.3 s8.2 s8.5 sinterpreterrealexecutionno code exec.bashonlyhybrid CWMOpusmined 1000 + preamblehybrid CWMHaikumined 1000 + preambledual 30 sOpusdual 30 sHaikudual 60 sOpusdual 60 sHaikudual 120 sOpusdual 120 sHaiku

Wall clock is calls × seconds per call. This chart isolates the second factor: the time the agent waits per step, which contains the model call and, in the world-model arms, the judge verdict; in the interpreter it contains the real execution. An arm that is slower here costs more per step; an arm that is slower only in wall clock took more steps.

Efficiency: median cost per instance (agent + world model, $; judge cost = graded observations x that arm's $/grade)

$0.00$1.20$2.40$3.60$4.80$6.00$0.23$0.24$0.73$0.30$2.30$0.38$2.37$0.38$2.36$0.37interpreterrealexecutionno code exec.bashonlyhybrid CWMOpusmined 1000 + preamblehybrid CWMHaikumined 1000 + preambledual 30 sOpusdual 30 sHaikudual 60 sOpusdual 60 sHaikudual 120 sOpusdual 120 sHaiku

What the agent does: command mix per setting

Every agent command classified by the routing rule (inner ring: interpreter vs code execution) and by type (outer ring). "Write file" = heredoc / echo redirects; "edit / file ops" = sed -i, mv, cp…; "run tests" = pytest and friends; "python script" = python x.py; "inline python" = python -c / heredoc.

interpreter — every command real · 31,996 commands, 64 per instance
60% bash40% code execread file17.5%search14.6%navigate / inspect24.7%write file1.8%edit / file ops1.1%git0.2%package mgmt0.0%other bash0.0%run tests12.6%python script16.3%inline python11.2%shell script0.0%other run0.0%
no code execution — routed commands never run, nothing returned · 34,569 commands, 69 per instance
84% bash16% code execread file31.1%search23.2%navigate / inspect18.4%write file6.7%edit / file ops3.5%git0.5%package mgmt0.0%other bash1.0%run tests1.9%python script7.8%inline python5.5%shell script0.3%other run0.1%
hybrid CWM · Opus — routed commands never run; Opus verdicts · 32,027 commands, 64 per instance
89% bash11% code execread file31.4%search23.1%navigate / inspect20.7%write file7.8%edit / file ops3.6%git0.9%other bash1.2%run tests0.6%python script6.4%inline python3.8%shell script0.3%other run0.1%
dual 60 s · Opus — routed commands run under 60 s; real output + verdict · 26,113 commands, 52 per instance
67% bash33% code execread file20.1%search18.3%navigate / inspect25.7%write file1.7%edit / file ops1.0%git0.2%package mgmt0.0%other bash0.1%run tests9.7%python script9.2%inline python13.9%shell script0.0%other run0.1%

3Example traces

Instance django__django-16485, the same task under both settings. Colours: agent command and reasoning, interpreter real output, CWM world-model text, withheld nothing returned; rc = the exit code the agent saw.

dual 60 s · Opus
25 commands · 25 answered by the interpreter · 0 by the CWM · 0 withheld
agentI'll start by exploring the repository structure and understanding the issue with the `floatformat()` function.
agent · cmd 1$ find /testbed -type f -name "*.py" | grep -E "(floatformat|defaultfilters)" | head -20
interpreterrc=0/testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py /testbed/tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py
agentGood! Let me examine the `floatformat` filter implementation:
agent · cmd 2$ cat /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py | grep -A 50 "def floatformat"
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [891 more chars]
agentLet me get more of the function:
agent · cmd 3$ cat /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py | grep -A 100 "def floatformat"
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [2413 more chars]
agentLet me see the rest:
agent · cmd 4$ cat /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py | grep -A 120 "def floatformat"
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [2864 more chars]
agentNow, let me look at the test file to understand the issue better:
agent · cmd 5$ cat /testbed/tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py
interpreterrc=0from decimal import Decimal, localcontext from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat from django.test import SimpleTestCase from django.utils import translation from django.utils.safestring import mark_safe from ..utils import setup class FloatformatTests(SimpleTestCase): @setup( { "floatformat01": ( "{% autoescape off %}{{ a|floatformat }} {{ b|floatformat }}" "{% endautoescape %}" ) } ) def test_floatformat01(self): output = self.engine.render_to_string( "floatformat01", {"a": "1.42", "b": mark_safe("1.42")} ) self.assertEqual(output, "1.4 1.4") @setup({"floatformat02": "{{ a|floatformat }} {{ b|floatformat }}"}) def test_floatformat02(self): output = self.engine.render_to_string( "floatformat02", {"a": "1.42", "b": mark_sa … [5484 more chars]
agentNow let me reproduce the issue:
agent · cmd 6$ cd /testbed && python -c " from decimal import Decimal from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat print('Test 1: floatformat(\"0.00\", 0)') try: result = floatformat('0.00', 0) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') print('\nTest 2: floatformat(Decimal(\"0.00\"), 0)') try: result = floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: Test 1: floatformat("0.00", 0) Error: ValueError: valid range for prec is [1, MAX_PREC] Test 2: floatformat(Decimal("0.00"), 0) Error: ValueError: valid range for prec is [1, MAX_PREC] ------------------------------------------------------------ Predicted reward: 0.00 (no source file changed yet)
agentGood! I've confirmed the issue. Now let me analyze the code more carefully. The problem is in how the precision is calculated. Let me trace through the code:
agent · cmd 7$ cd /testbed && python -c " from decimal import Decimal d = Decimal('0.00') print(f'd = {d}') print(f'd.as_tuple() = {d.as_tuple()}') m = int(d) - d print(f'm = {m}') p = 0 print(f'p = {p}') tupl = d.as_tuple() print(f'tupl = {tupl}') print(f'tupl[1] = {tupl[1]}') print(f'len(tupl[1]) = {len(tupl[1])}') print(f'tupl[2] = {tupl[2]}') units = len(tupl[1]) print(f'units (initial) = {units}') units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] print(f'units (after adjustment) = {units}') prec = abs(p) + units + 1 print(f'prec = abs({p}) + {units} + 1 = {prec}') "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: d = 0.00 d.as_tuple() = DecimalTuple(sign=0, digits=(0,), exponent=-2) m = 0.00 p = 0 tupl = DecimalTuple(sign=0, digits=(0,), exponent=-2) tupl[1] = (0,) len(tupl[1]) = 1 tupl[2] = -2 units (initial) = 1 units (after adjustment) = -1 prec = abs(0) + -1 + 1 = 0 ------------------------------------------------------------ Predicted reward: 0.00 (no source file changed yet)
agentAha! The precision is calculated as 0, which is invalid. The Decimal context requires `prec >= 1`. The issue is in the calculation of `units`. Let me look at the code logic more carefully:
agent · cmd 8$ cd /testbed && python -c " from decimal import Decimal # Test with different values test_cases = [ '0.00', # Problematic case '0.0', '0', '1.23', '0.12', ] for val in test_cases: d = Decimal(val) m = int(d) - d p = 0 tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] prec = abs(p) + units + 1 print(f'{val:8} -> units={units:3}, prec={prec}') "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: 0.00 -> units= -1, prec=0 0.0 -> units= 0, prec=1 0 -> units= 1, prec=2 1.23 -> units= 5, prec=6 0.12 -> units= 4, prec=5 ------------------------------------------------------------ Predicted reward: 0.00 (no source file changed yet)
agentI see the issue! When we have `0.00`, the exponent is -2, and since `m` (fractional part) is 0, we add `tupl[2]` which is -2, so `1 + (-2) = -1`. This gives us a negative units value, which causes prec to be 0. The fix should ensure that `prec` is always at least 1. Let me look at the complete code again and understand the logic:
agent · cmd 9$ cd /testbed && python -c " # Let's understand what the units calculation is supposed to do from decimal import Decimal # The idea is: # - tupl[1] is the digits tuple # - tupl[2] is the exponent # For Decimal('0.00'): # digits = (0,) -> 1 digit # exponent = -2 -> means the value is 0 * 10^-2 # # The 'units' is supposed to represent the number of significant digits # But the formula seems wrong for numbers like 0.00 # Let's check what the code expects: # prec is used in: Context(prec=prec) # And then: rounded_d = d.quantize(exp, ROUND_HALF_UP, Context(prec=prec)) # So prec must be > 0 # The issue is that when we have 0.00, the calculation gives us: # units = 1 + (-2) = -1, which makes prec = 0 # The fix should ensure prec is at least 1 "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: ------------------------------------------------------------ Predicted reward: 0.00 (no source file changed yet)
agentNow let me look at the entire floatformat function one more time to understand the full context:
agent · cmd 10$ cd /testbed && sed -n '/^def floatformat/,/^def /p' django/template/defaultfilters.py | head -140
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [2731 more chars]
agentNow I understand the issue better. The problem is that the precision calculation doesn't account for the case where the calculated precision becomes less than 1. The fix should ensure that `prec` is always at least 1, since the Decimal context requires it. Let me check what would be reasonable values for the test case:
agent · cmd 11$ cd /testbed && python -c " from decimal import Decimal, Context, ROUND_HALF_UP # The issue: prec calculation gives 0 for '0.00' with p=0 d = Decimal('0.00') p = 0 tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += tupl[2] # When m=0 (no fractional part) prec_wrong = abs(p) + units + 1 print(f'Wrong prec: {prec_wrong}') # The fix: ensure prec is at least 1 prec = max(1, abs(p) + units + 1) print(f'Fixed prec: {prec}') # Now test with the fixed prec exp = Decimal(1).scaleb(-abs(p)) print(f'exp: {exp}') rounded_d = d.quantize(exp, ROUND_HALF_UP, Context(prec=prec)) print(f'rounded_d: {rounded_d}') "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: Wrong prec: 0 Fixed prec: 1 exp: 1 rounded_d: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------ Predicted reward: 0.00 (no source file changed yet)
agentPerfect! Now let me implement the fix in the actual file:
agent · cmd 12$ cd /testbed && grep -n "prec = abs(p) + units + 1" django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0186: prec = abs(p) + units + 1
agentNow I'll modify the file to fix the issue:
agent · cmd 13$ cd /testbed && python << 'EOF' # Read the file with open('django/template/defaultfilters.py', 'r') as f: lines = f.readlines() # Find and modify the line for i, line in enumerate(lines): if 'prec = abs(p) + units + 1' in line: # Replace with the fixed version lines[i] = line.replace('prec = abs(p) + units + 1', 'prec = max(1, abs(p) + units + 1)') print(f"Modified line {i+1}: {lines[i].rstrip()}") break # Write back the file with open('django/template/defaultfilters.py', 'w') as f: f.writelines(lines) print("File modified successfully") EOF
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: Modified line 186: prec = max(1, abs(p) + units + 1) File modified successfully ------------------------------------------------------------ [Coding world model] Your command was NOT executed. A reward model graded your current change (git diff) against review criteria. Below: the predicted reward, then every applicable criterion with its reward (1 = satisfied, 0 = violated). Predicted reward: 1.00 (1 applicable criteria) [reward 1] ### The change does not implement the behavior the task requires - **Applies when**: always -- this criterion is derived from the task statement itself. - **Pattern**: The diff does not make the behavior described in the task actually happen: it edits the wrong location, changes something adjacent to the reported symptom, only adds tests/scripts/logging, or handles a different case than the one reported. Apply the diff … [1159 more chars]
agentGreat! The fix was applied and the reward model indicates it satisfies the criterion. Let me now test that the fix actually works:
agent · cmd 14$ cd /testbed && python -c " from decimal import Decimal from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat print('Test 1: floatformat(\"0.00\", 0)') try: result = floatformat('0.00', 0) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') print('\nTest 2: floatformat(Decimal(\"0.00\"), 0)') try: result = floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') print('\nTest 3: floatformat(\"0.00\")') try: result = floatformat('0.00') print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') print('\nTest 4: floatformat(Decimal(\"0.00\"))') try: result = floatformat(Decimal('0.00')) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: Test 1: floatformat("0.00", 0) Error: ImproperlyConfigured: Requested setting USE_I18N, but settings are not configured. You must either define the environment variable DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE or call settings.configure() before accessing settings. Test 2: floatformat(Decimal("0.00"), 0) Error: ImproperlyConfigured: Requested setting USE_I18N, but settings are not configured. You must either define the environment variable DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE or call settings.configure() before accessing settings. Test 3: floatformat("0.00") Error: ImproperlyConfigured: Requested setting USE_I18N, but settings are not configured. You must either define the environment variable DJANGO_SETTINGS_MODULE or call settings.configure() before accessing settings. Test 4: floatformat(Decimal("0.00")) Error: ImproperlyConfigured: Requested setting USE_I18N, but settings are not confi … [2082 more chars]
agentI need to configure Django settings. Let me do that:
agent · cmd 15$ cd /testbed && python -c " import django from django.conf import settings if not settings.configured: settings.configure( DEBUG=True, USE_I18N=True, USE_L10N=True, LANGUAGE_CODE='en-us', ) django.setup() from decimal import Decimal from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat print('Test 1: floatformat(\"0.00\", 0)') try: result = floatformat('0.00', 0) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') print('\nTest 2: floatformat(Decimal(\"0.00\"), 0)') try: result = floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') print('\nTest 3: floatformat(\"0.00\")') try: result = floatformat('0.00') print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') print('\nTest 4: floatformat(Decimal(\"0.00\"))') try: result = floatformat(Decimal('0.00')) print(f'Result: {result}') except Exception as e: print(f'Error: {type(e).__name__}: {e}') "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: Test 1: floatformat("0.00", 0) Result: 0 Test 2: floatformat(Decimal("0.00"), 0) Result: 0 Test 3: floatformat("0.00") Result: 0 Test 4: floatformat(Decimal("0.00")) Result: 0 ------------------------------------------------------------ [Coding world model] Your command was NOT executed. A reward model graded your current change (git diff) against review criteria. Below: the predicted reward, then every applicable criterion with its reward (1 = satisfied, 0 = violated). Predicted reward: 1.00 (3 applicable criteria) [reward 1] ### The change does not implement the behavior the task requires - **Applies when**: always -- this criterion is derived from the task statement itself. - **Pattern**: The diff does not make the behavior described in the task actually happen: it edits the wrong location, changes something adjacent to the reported symptom, only … [6266 more chars]
agentExcellent! The fix is working! The tests now pass with the correct results. Let me verify the change was actually applied:
agent · cmd 16$ cd /testbed && sed -n '180,190p' django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0exp = Decimal(1).scaleb(-abs(p)) # Set the precision high enough to avoid an exception (#15789). tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] prec = max(1, abs(p) + units + 1) # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly. rounded_d = d.quantize(exp, ROUND_HALF_UP, Context(prec=prec))
agentPerfect! The fix has been applied. Let me run the existing test suite to ensure my changes don't break anything:
agent · cmd 17$ cd /testbed && python -m pytest tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py -v
interpreterrc=1[interpreter] real output: /opt/miniconda3/envs/testbed/bin/python: No module named pytest ------------------------------------------------------------ [Coding world model] Your command was NOT executed. A reward model graded your current change (git diff) against review criteria. Below: the predicted reward, then every applicable criterion with its reward (1 = satisfied, 0 = violated). Predicted reward: 1.00 (1 applicable criteria) [reward 1] ### The change does not implement the behavior the task requires - **Applies when**: always -- this criterion is derived from the task statement itself. - **Pattern**: The diff does not make the behavior described in the task actually happen: it edits the wrong location, changes something adjacent to the reported symptom, only adds tests/scripts/logging, or handles a different case than the one reported. Apply the diff mentally and ask wh … [1139 more chars]
agentLet me use Django's test runner instead:
agent · cmd 18$ cd /testbed && python -m django test tests.template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests --settings=tests.settings
interpreterrc=1[interpreter] real output: Traceback (most recent call last): File "<frozen runpy>", line 198, in _run_module_as_main File "<frozen runpy>", line 88, in _run_code File "/testbed/django/__main__.py", line 9, in <module> management.execute_from_command_line() File "/testbed/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 442, in execute_from_command_line utility.execute() File "/testbed/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 436, in execute self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) File "/testbed/django/core/management/commands/test.py", line 24, in run_from_argv super().run_from_argv(argv) File "/testbed/django/core/management/base.py", line 394, in run_from_argv parser = self.create_parser(argv[0], argv[1]) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ File "/testbed/django/core/management/base.py", line 357, in create_parser self.ad … [3293 more chars]
agentLet me find the correct test setup:
agent · cmd 19$ cd /testbed && find . -name "runtests.py" -o -name "manage.py" | head -5
interpreterrc=0./tests/i18n/sampleproject/manage.py ./tests/runtests.py
agentLet me use the runtests.py script:
agent · cmd 20$ cd /testbed && python tests/runtests.py template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests -v 2
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: Testing against Django installed in '/testbed/django' with up to 16 processes Importing application template_tests Found 8 test(s). Skipping setup of unused database(s): default, other. System check identified no issues (0 silenced). test_float_dunder_method (template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests.test_float_dunder_method) ... ok test_force_grouping (template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests.test_force_grouping) ... ok test_infinity (template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests.test_infinity) ... ok test_inputs (template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests.test_inputs) ... ok test_low_decimal_precision (template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests.test_low_decimal_precision) #15789 ... ok test_negative_zero_values (template_tests.filter_tests.test_floatformat.FunctionTests.test_negat … [2272 more chars]
agentGreat! All the floatformat tests pass! Now let me check the git diff to see what was changed:
agent · cmd 21$ cd /testbed && git diff django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0diff --git a/django/template/defaultfilters.py b/django/template/defaultfilters.py index 23c3a08c67..3032a36f76 100644 --- a/django/template/defaultfilters.py +++ b/django/template/defaultfilters.py @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ def floatformat(text, arg=-1): tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] - prec = abs(p) + units + 1 + prec = max(1, abs(p) + units + 1) # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly.
agentPerfect! Now let me verify the fix one more time with comprehensive test cases:
agent · cmd 22$ cd /testbed && python -c " import django from django.conf import settings if not settings.configured: settings.configure( DEBUG=True, USE_I18N=True, USE_L10N=True, LANGUAGE_CODE='en-us', ) django.setup() from decimal import Decimal from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat # Test cases from PR description test_cases = [ ('0.00', 0, '0'), (Decimal('0.00'), 0, '0'), ('0.00', None, '0'), # Test with default argument (Decimal('0.00'), None, '0'), # Additional test cases to ensure the fix doesn't break other cases ('1.23', 0, '1'), ('1.23', 2, '1.23'), ('0.007', 0, '0'), (0.0, 0, '0'), ] print('Testing floatformat fixes:') for value, arg, expected in test_cases: try: if arg is None: result = floatformat(value) else: result = floatformat(value, arg) status = '✓' if result == expected else '✗' print(f'{status} floatformat({value!r}, {arg!r}) = {result!r} (expected {expected!r})') except Exception as e: print(f'✗ floatformat({value!r}, {arg!r}) raised {type(e).__name__}: {e}') "
interpreterrc=0[interpreter] real output: Testing floatformat fixes: ✓ floatformat('0.00', 0) = '0' (expected '0') ✓ floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0) = '0' (expected '0') ✓ floatformat('0.00', None) = '0' (expected '0') ✓ floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), None) = '0' (expected '0') ✓ floatformat('1.23', 0) = '1' (expected '1') ✓ floatformat('1.23', 2) = '1.23' (expected '1.23') ✓ floatformat('0.007', 0) = '0' (expected '0') ✓ floatformat(0.0, 0) = '0' (expected '0') ------------------------------------------------------------ [Coding world model] Your command was NOT executed. A reward model graded your current change (git diff) against review criteria. Below: the predicted reward, then every applicable criterion with its reward (1 = satisfied, 0 = violated). Predicted reward: 1.00 (1 applicable criteria) [reward 1] ### The change does not implement the behavior the task requires - **Applies when**: alwa … [1498 more chars]
agentExcellent! All test cases pass. The reward model indicates the change successfully implements the required behavior. Now let me create the patch file as instructed:
agent · cmd 23$ cd /testbed && git diff django/template/defaultfilters.py > patch.txt
interpreterrc=0(empty)
agentNow let me verify the patch file contains only the intended changes:
agent · cmd 24$ cat /testbed/patch.txt
interpreterrc=0diff --git a/django/template/defaultfilters.py b/django/template/defaultfilters.py index 23c3a08c67..3032a36f76 100644 --- a/django/template/defaultfilters.py +++ b/django/template/defaultfilters.py @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ def floatformat(text, arg=-1): tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] - prec = abs(p) + units + 1 + prec = max(1, abs(p) + units + 1) # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly.
agentPerfect! The patch file only contains the one-line fix to the source code that addresses the issue. Now I'll submit the final output:
agent · cmd 25$ echo COMPLETE_TASK_AND_SUBMIT_FINAL_OUTPUT && cat patch.txt
interpreterrc=(empty)
hybrid CWM · Opus
25 commands · 25 answered by the interpreter · 0 by the CWM · 0 withheld
agentI'll start by analyzing the codebase to understand the issue with the `floatformat()` function crashing on "0.00".
agent · cmd 1$ find /testbed -type f -name "*.py" | grep -E "(floatformat|defaultfilters)" | head -20
interpreterrc=0/testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py /testbed/tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py
agentGood! Let me look at the floatformat implementation first:
agent · cmd 2$ cat /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py | grep -A 100 "def floatformat"
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [2413 more chars]
agentLet me get the complete function:
agent · cmd 3$ cat /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py | grep -A 120 "def floatformat"
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [2864 more chars]
agentNow let me look at the test file to understand what the expected behavior is:
agent · cmd 4$ cat /testbed/tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py
interpreterrc=0from decimal import Decimal, localcontext from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat from django.test import SimpleTestCase from django.utils import translation from django.utils.safestring import mark_safe from ..utils import setup class FloatformatTests(SimpleTestCase): @setup( { "floatformat01": ( "{% autoescape off %}{{ a|floatformat }} {{ b|floatformat }}" "{% endautoescape %}" ) } ) def test_floatformat01(self): output = self.engine.render_to_string( "floatformat01", {"a": "1.42", "b": mark_safe("1.42")} ) self.assertEqual(output, "1.4 1.4") @setup({"floatformat02": "{{ a|floatformat }} {{ b|floatformat }}"}) def test_floatformat02(self): output = self.engine.render_to_string( "floatformat02", {"a": "1.42", "b": mark_sa … [5484 more chars]
agentNow let me understand what the issue is. The PR says `floatformat('0.00', 0)` and `floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0)` both throw `ValueError: valid range for prec is [1, MAX_PREC]`. This is a problem with the Context precision being set too low. Let me trace through the code: 1. For `floatformat('0.00', 0)`, we have `text='0.00'` and `arg=0` 2. `d = Decimal('0.00')` 3. `p = 0` 4. `m = int(d) - d =…
agent · cmd 5$ cd /testbed && python3 -c " from decimal import Decimal # Test case from PR d = Decimal('0.00') p = 0 m = int(d) - d print(f'd={d}, p={p}, m={m}') tupl = d.as_tuple() print(f'tupl={tupl}') units = len(tupl[1]) print(f'units before adjustment: {units}') units += tupl[2] print(f'units after adjustment: {units}') prec = abs(p) + units + 1 print(f'prec={prec}') "
interpreterrc=1Predicted reward: 0.00 (no source file changed yet)
agentLet me look more closely at the defaultfilters.py file to understand the complete context:
agent · cmd 6$ head -50 /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0"""Default variable filters.""" import random as random_module import re import types import warnings from decimal import ROUND_HALF_UP, Context, Decimal, InvalidOperation from functools import wraps from inspect import unwrap from operator import itemgetter from pprint import pformat from urllib.parse import quote from django.utils import formats from django.utils.dateformat import format, time_format from django.utils.deprecation import RemovedInDjango51Warning from django.utils.encoding import iri_to_uri from django.utils.html import avoid_wrapping, conditional_escape, escape, escapejs from django.utils.html import json_script as _json_script from django.utils.html import linebreaks, strip_tags from django.utils.html import urlize as _urlize from django.utils.safestring import SafeData, mark_safe from django.utils.text import Truncator, normalize_newlines, phone2numeric from django.u … [796 more chars]
agentNow let me examine the floatformat function more carefully. The issue is that when `prec` becomes 0 or negative, it violates the constraint that `prec` must be at least 1. Let me create a patch to fix this:
agent · cmd 7$ cd /testbed && grep -n "def floatformat" django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=096:def floatformat(text, arg=-1):
agentLet me look at the exact section around the prec calculation:
agent · cmd 8$ sed -n '96,180p' /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [1754 more chars]
agent · cmd 9$ sed -n '180,210p' /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0exp = Decimal(1).scaleb(-abs(p)) # Set the precision high enough to avoid an exception (#15789). tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] prec = abs(p) + units + 1 # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly. rounded_d = d.quantize(exp, ROUND_HALF_UP, Context(prec=prec)) sign, digits, exponent = rounded_d.as_tuple() digits = [str(digit) for digit in reversed(digits)] while len(digits) <= abs(exponent): digits.append("0") digits.insert(-exponent, ".") if sign and rounded_d: digits.append("-") number = "".join(reversed(digits)) return mark_safe( formats.number_format( number, abs(p), use_l10n=use_l10n, force_grouping=force_grouping, ) … [49 more chars]
agentNow I understand the issue. The problem is that `prec = abs(p) + units + 1` can result in a value less than 1, which violates the Decimal Context constraint. Let me analyze when this happens: For `floatformat('0.00', 0)`: - `d = Decimal('0.00')` - `p = 0` - `m = int(0) - Decimal('0.00') = 0 - 0 = 0` - `tupl = (0, (0,), -2)` (sign=0, digits=(0,), exponent=-2) - `units = len((0,)) = 1` - Since `m =…
agent · cmd 10$ cat > /tmp/fix.py << 'EOF' # Read the file with open('/testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py', 'r') as f: content = f.read() # Find and replace the problematic line old_line = " prec = abs(p) + units + 1" new_line = " prec = max(abs(p) + units + 1, 1)" if old_line in content: content = content.replace(old_line, new_line) print("Replacement successful") else: print("Old line not found") # Write back with open('/testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py', 'w') as f: f.write(content) EOF python3 /tmp/fix.py
interpreterrc=1Predicted reward: 0.00 (no source file changed yet)
agentLet me try a different approach - directly editing the file:
agent · cmd 11$ cat /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py | sed -n '170,210p'
interpreterrc=0if not m and p < 0: return mark_safe( formats.number_format( "%d" % (int(d)), 0, use_l10n=use_l10n, force_grouping=force_grouping, ) ) exp = Decimal(1).scaleb(-abs(p)) # Set the precision high enough to avoid an exception (#15789). tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] prec = abs(p) + units + 1 # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly. rounded_d = d.quantize(exp, ROUND_HALF_UP, Context(prec=prec)) sign, digits, exponent = rounded_d.as_tuple() digits = [str(digit) for digit in reversed(digits)] while len(digits) <= abs(exponent): digits.append("0") digits.insert(-exponent, ".") if sign and rounded_d: … [293 more chars]
agentNow let me use sed to make the replacement:
agent · cmd 12$ cd /testbed && sed -i 's/prec = abs(p) + units + 1/prec = max(abs(p) + units + 1, 1)/' django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0(empty)
agentGood! Let me verify the change was made:
agent · cmd 13$ sed -n '180,195p' /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0exp = Decimal(1).scaleb(-abs(p)) # Set the precision high enough to avoid an exception (#15789). tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] prec = max(abs(p) + units + 1, 1) # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly. rounded_d = d.quantize(exp, ROUND_HALF_UP, Context(prec=prec)) sign, digits, exponent = rounded_d.as_tuple() digits = [str(digit) for digit in reversed(digits)] while len(digits) <= abs(exponent): digits.append("0") digits.insert(-exponent, ".")
agentExcellent! Now let me verify that the fix works by checking if there are any existing test cases related to this and running the tests:
agent · cmd 14$ cd /testbed && grep -n "0.00" tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py
interpreterrc=042: self.assertEqual(floatformat(0.007), "0.0") 46: self.assertEqual(floatformat(6.000000, 3), "6.000") 47: self.assertEqual(floatformat(6.200000, 3), "6.200") 48: self.assertEqual(floatformat(6.200000, -3), "6.200") 51: self.assertEqual(floatformat(11.0000, -2), "11") 52: self.assertEqual(floatformat(11.000001, -2), "11.00") 71: "-132329713804079800000000000000000000.00", 75: "-132329713804079800000000000000000000", 77: self.assertEqual(floatformat(1.5e-15, 20), "0.00000000000000150000") 78: self.assertEqual(floatformat(1.5e-15, -20), "0.00000000000000150000") 79: self.assertEqual(floatformat(1.00000000000000015, 16), "1.0000000000000002") 83: self.assertEqual(floatformat(10000, "g"), "10,000") 86: self.assertEqual(floatformat(10000, "g2"), "10000") 88: self.assertEqual( … [562 more chars]
agentI see there are already tests for zero values with different arguments. Let me check if the specific test case from the PR description would be covered. Let me look for test cases with arg=0:
agent · cmd 15$ cd /testbed && grep -n ", 0)" tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py
interpreterrc=044: self.assertEqual(floatformat(7.7, 0), "8")
agentI see there's one test with `arg=0`, but it's for `7.7`. Let me verify my fix works by creating a test script:
agent · cmd 16$ cat > /tmp/test_fix.py << 'EOF' import sys sys.path.insert(0, '/testbed') from decimal import Decimal from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat # Test cases from the PR print("Testing floatformat('0.00', 0)...") try: result = floatformat('0.00', 0) print(f"Result: {result}") print("✓ Test passed") except Exception as e: print(f"✗ Test failed: {e}") print("\nTesting floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0)...") try: result = floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0) print(f"Result: {result}") print("✓ Test passed") except Exception as e: print(f"✗ Test failed: {e}") # Additional test cases print("\nTesting floatformat(0, 0)...") try: result = floatformat(0, 0) print(f"Result: {result}") print("✓ Test passed") except Exception as e: print(f"✗ Test failed: {e}") # Make sure we didn't break existing functionality print("\nTesting floatformat(7.7, 0)...") try: result = floatformat(7.7, 0) print(f"Result: {result}") assert result == "8", f"Expected '8', got '{result}'" print("✓ Test passed") except Exception as e: print(f"✗ Test failed: {e}") print("\nTesting floatformat(0, 6)...") try: result = floatformat(0, 6)
interpreterrc=0[Coding world model] Your command was NOT executed. A reward model graded your current change (git diff) against review criteria. Below: the predicted reward, then every applicable criterion with its reward (1 = satisfied, 0 = violated). Predicted reward: 1.00 (1 applicable criteria) [reward 1] ### The change does not implement the behavior the task requires - **Applies when**: always -- this criterion is derived from the task statement itself. - **Pattern**: The diff does not make the behavior described in the task actually happen: it edits the wrong location, changes something adjacent to the reported symptom, only adds tests/scripts/logging, or handles a different case than the one reported. Apply the diff mentally and ask whether the exact symptom described in the task would still occur. - **Detection procedure**: 1. From the task statement, state the concrete before/after … [985 more chars]
agentGreat! The criterion says the change has been successfully applied. Let me verify that the changes are correct by examining the modified file:
agent · cmd 17$ cd /testbed && git diff django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0diff --git a/django/template/defaultfilters.py b/django/template/defaultfilters.py index 23c3a08c67..7ace6675d5 100644 --- a/django/template/defaultfilters.py +++ b/django/template/defaultfilters.py @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ def floatformat(text, arg=-1): tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] - prec = abs(p) + units + 1 + prec = max(abs(p) + units + 1, 1) # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly.
agentPerfect! The change looks correct. Now let me make sure there are no other places in the code that need similar fixes. Let me search for other uses of `Context(prec=` to see if there are similar issues:
agent · cmd 18$ cd /testbed && grep -r "Context(prec=" --include="*.py" | grep -v test
interpreterrc=0django/db/models/fields/__init__.py: return decimal.Context(prec=self.max_digits) django/db/backends/sqlite3/operations.py: create_decimal = decimal.Context(prec=15).create_decimal_from_float django/db/backends/oracle/base.py: context = decimal.Context(prec=precision) django/template/defaultfilters.py: rounded_d = d.quantize(exp, ROUND_HALF_UP, Context(prec=prec))
agentThe only place in the defaultfilters.py is the one I already fixed. Now let me run the existing tests to make sure my change doesn't break anything:
agent · cmd 19$ cd /testbed && python3 -m pytest tests/template_tests/filter_tests/test_floatformat.py -xvs 2>&1 | head -100
interpreterrc=0[Coding world model] Your command was NOT executed. A reward model graded your current change (git diff) against review criteria. Below: the predicted reward, then every applicable criterion with its reward (1 = satisfied, 0 = violated). Predicted reward: 1.00 (1 applicable criteria) [reward 1] ### The change does not implement the behavior the task requires - **Applies when**: always -- this criterion is derived from the task statement itself. - **Pattern**: The diff does not make the behavior described in the task actually happen: it edits the wrong location, changes something adjacent to the reported symptom, only adds tests/scripts/logging, or handles a different case than the one reported. Apply the diff mentally and ask whether the exact symptom described in the task would still occur. - **Detection procedure**: 1. From the task statement, state the concrete before/after … [985 more chars]
agentI see. The reward model is saying the change is correct. This criterion message is actually positive - it says [reward 1], which means it's satisfied. Let me check if I can actually look at what the behavior should be. Let me create a simple test to make sure the fix works:
agent · cmd 20$ cat > /tmp/simple_test.py << 'EOF' import sys sys.path.insert(0, '/testbed') from decimal import Decimal from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat # Test the specific cases mentioned in the PR print("Test 1: floatformat('0.00', 0)") result1 = floatformat('0.00', 0) print(f"Result: '{result1}'") print("\nTest 2: floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0)") result2 = floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0) print(f"Result: '{result2}'") print("\nTest 3: floatformat(0, 0)") result3 = floatformat(0, 0) print(f"Result: '{result3}'") print("\nTest 4: floatformat(0.007)") result4 = floatformat(0.007) print(f"Result: '{result4}'") print("\nTest 5: floatformat(7.7, 0)") result5 = floatformat(7.7, 0) print(f"Result: '{result5}'") print("\nAll tests passed successfully!") EOF cat /tmp/simple_test.py
interpreterrc=0import sys sys.path.insert(0, '/testbed') from decimal import Decimal from django.template.defaultfilters import floatformat # Test the specific cases mentioned in the PR print("Test 1: floatformat('0.00', 0)") result1 = floatformat('0.00', 0) print(f"Result: '{result1}'") print("\nTest 2: floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0)") result2 = floatformat(Decimal('0.00'), 0) print(f"Result: '{result2}'") print("\nTest 3: floatformat(0, 0)") result3 = floatformat(0, 0) print(f"Result: '{result3}'") print("\nTest 4: floatformat(0.007)") result4 = floatformat(0.007) print(f"Result: '{result4}'") print("\nTest 5: floatformat(7.7, 0)") result5 = floatformat(7.7, 0) print(f"Result: '{result5}'") print("\nAll tests passed successfully!")
agentNow let me verify that my patch is the only change needed. Let me look more carefully at the code path to make sure the fix is correct:
agent · cmd 21$ sed -n '96,210p' /testbed/django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0def floatformat(text, arg=-1): """ Display a float to a specified number of decimal places. If called without an argument, display the floating point number with one decimal place -- but only if there's a decimal place to be displayed: * num1 = 34.23234 * num2 = 34.00000 * num3 = 34.26000 * {{ num1|floatformat }} displays "34.2" * {{ num2|floatformat }} displays "34" * {{ num3|floatformat }} displays "34.3" If arg is positive, always display exactly arg number of decimal places: * {{ num1|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.000" * {{ num3|floatformat:3 }} displays "34.260" If arg is negative, display arg number of decimal places -- but only if there are places to be displayed: * {{ num1|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34.232" * {{ num2|floatformat:"-3" }} displays "34" * … [2717 more chars]
agentGood! The fix is in place. Now let me verify the patch is correct by creating the final patch file:
agent · cmd 22$ cd /testbed && git diff django/template/defaultfilters.py > /tmp/patch.txt && cat /tmp/patch.txt
interpreterrc=0diff --git a/django/template/defaultfilters.py b/django/template/defaultfilters.py index 23c3a08c67..7ace6675d5 100644 --- a/django/template/defaultfilters.py +++ b/django/template/defaultfilters.py @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ def floatformat(text, arg=-1): tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] - prec = abs(p) + units + 1 + prec = max(abs(p) + units + 1, 1) # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly.
agentPerfect! The patch looks correct. Let me verify the change one more time to understand what it does: 1. The issue is that when formatting `'0.00'` with `arg=0`, the calculation of `prec` results in 0. 2. The Decimal Context requires `prec` to be at least 1. 3. My fix ensures that `prec` is always at least 1 by using `max(abs(p) + units + 1, 1)`. Now let me copy the patch to the proper location f…
agent · cmd 23$ cp /tmp/patch.txt /testbed/patch.txt && cat /testbed/patch.txt
interpreterrc=0diff --git a/django/template/defaultfilters.py b/django/template/defaultfilters.py index 23c3a08c67..7ace6675d5 100644 --- a/django/template/defaultfilters.py +++ b/django/template/defaultfilters.py @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ def floatformat(text, arg=-1): tupl = d.as_tuple() units = len(tupl[1]) units += -tupl[2] if m else tupl[2] - prec = abs(p) + units + 1 + prec = max(abs(p) + units + 1, 1) # Avoid conversion to scientific notation by accessing `sign`, `digits`, # and `exponent` from Decimal.as_tuple() directly.
agentExcellent! Now I'm ready to submit. Let me verify the patch is correct by looking at the context once more:
agent · cmd 24$ cd /testbed && git diff --stat django/template/defaultfilters.py
interpreterrc=0django/template/defaultfilters.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
agentPerfect! The patch only modifies the one line that needs to be fixed. Now let me submit:
agent · cmd 25$ echo COMPLETE_TASK_AND_SUBMIT_FINAL_OUTPUT && cat /testbed/patch.txt
interpreterrc=(empty)

4Curation cost per rubric

On-policy mining from the SWE-Gym real-bug on-policy mining (see the 9/07 page for the curation cost table): the same Haiku agent runs on pool tasks with real execution, every failed rollout is distilled into one lesson by Opus, lessons are deduplicated and cut into the 10 / 100 / all libraries. No CWM grading during mining and no precision filter, so the per-rubric cost is the "cheap" recipe of the SWE-bench page. Prices: Opus 5 $5 / $25 per M tokens, Haiku 4.5 $1 / $5, GKE Spot ≈ $0.045 per node-hour.

itemvalue
pool rollouts (Haiku interpreter agent, real execution)pending
median agent cost per rolloutpending
failures distilled (Opus, one call per failure, ~$0.09 each)pending
lessons after dedup at 0.90 = library sizepending
cost per kept rubric (agent + distillation + pods)pending